Why is it that when a liberal is in a significant position, conservatives insist on covertly pulling out a?

it is just like when Bush was initially elected. It was made to seem as if Bush was just running his campaign minding his own business, while Gore actually did the same. Even when the votes were in and it appeared that Gore had won conservative partisans still maintained their innocence, even while they spent days trying to ascertain that Bush had recieved more "electorial votes" and had therefore won the election as opposed to just conceding to the latter. And yet no attempt was even made by Kerry to refute when he lost four years later. Kerry simply took the loss like a man and accepted it for what it was. There was none of this days of immature "electoral college" bribery or the like. My point is that what I have described has had sort of a history of happening whenever a conservative was on the losing end of the spectrum (although it has not always worked). I just don't want to see it happen again and have McCain "win", when more people vote for Obama. We CANNOT allow McCain to win